<aside>
💡
User Story: As a product manager, I want an audit tool so that it flags accessibility issues before client does.
</aside>
Acceptance Criteria
- [ ] Tool scans product against recognized accessibility standards (e.g., WCAG 2.2 AA) and produces a report.
- [ ] Report includes issue severity, location, and remediation guidance.
- [ ] Audit can be run on-demand and complete in ≤ 5 minutes for a standard web application.
- [ ] Output format is easy to share with internal team and clients (PDF + web view).
- [ ] Report clearly differentiates must-fix (compliance) vs. nice-to-have (best practice) items.
- [ ] At least 90% accuracy in identifying accessibility issues when tested against known benchmarks.
Resources
Web Accessibility Evaluation Tools | Apple Guidelines
Dark mode/theme
<aside>
💡
User Story: As a user with migraines, I want dark mode options so I can avoid eye strain.
</aside>
Acceptance Criteria:
- [ ] A toggle for dark mode is available on every page of the site/app.
- [ ] Dark mode changes all text, backgrounds, and key UI elements to accessible contrast ratios (meeting WCAG 2.2 AA contrast guidelines).
- [ ] Dark mode preference is saved and persists across sessions/devices.
- [ ] Default color scheme is tested for migraine-friendly palettes (avoiding high-saturation or flickering elements).
- [ ] All icons and images adjust to remain visible and clear in dark mode.
Resources
GitLab Handbook | Apple Guidelines | Google Guidelines | CSS Guide